Aller au contenu principal

Digital and Interactive Media


3 min. de lecture


Where does authorship lie in digital art?

The final creation may matter less than the code, design, and structure that brought it to life.

In digital art, creation is often a shared process. A virtual reality experience, for example, may bring together a visual artist, a programmer, a 3D designer, and a sound engineer, each contributing to one integrated work. In legal terms, such a work is usually considered a joint creation, where all contributors share authorship and rights. To avoid disputes, it is crucial to define each person’s creative role, ownership share, and rights of use in advance, typically through written agreements.

Are Users Also Creators?

But what about the audience--the people who click or somehow shape an outcome on screen? Are they co-authors too? Under most laws, the answer is no. The user acts within the creative framework designed by the artist: the visuals, the rules, the code. Users’ interactions may complete the work, but interactions do not make the users authors.

Where is the Creative Core?

In digital art, authorship lies less in a single finished image and more in the creative expression captured by the code, design, and structure that bring an artwork to life.

Imagine an artist who creates a generative art program that turns live news data into abstract, ever-changing images. In such a case, the artist’s copyrightable work is the code itself: the algorithms, visual parameters, and overall structure they designed. The incoming news data is only an input, and each image is a direct result of the artist’s authored system. Even though no two images look the same, and none are drawn by hand, the belongs to the artist as the creator of the generative process.

In many countries, the underlying elements of generative art, such as code, algorithms, or custom software, are protected by , most commonly as literary works, because computer programs are generally classified in that category.

By contrast, the automatically-generated images may not always receive separate protection if they do not involve additional human creative choices at the moment of creation, even though they may look like traditional artistic works. What is generally protected is the authored system itself—the set of creative decisions, structures, and parameters designed by the artist, which forms the foundation for these dynamic and evolving outputs.

Image credit: akinbostanci